> > Other than the fact Linux has a cool name, could someone explain why I
> > should use Linux over BSD?
>
> No. That's it. The cool name, that is. We worked very hard on
> creating a name that would appeal to the majority of people, and it
> certainly paid off: thousands of people are using linux just to be able
> to say "OS/2? Hah. I've got Linux. What a cool name". 386BSD made the
> mistake of putting a lot of numbers and weird abbreviations into the
> name, and is scaring away a lot of people just because it sounds too
> technical.
(Linus Torvalds' follow-up to a question about Linux)
Arnold's Laws of Documentation:
(1) If it should exist, it doesn't.
(2) If it does exist, it's out of date.
(3) Only documentation for useless programs transcends the
first two laws.
Various documentation updates and bugfixes (the best way to know that a
stable kernel is approaching is to notice that somebody starts to
spellcheck the kernel - it has so far never failed)
— Linus Torvalds in the annoucement for pre-2.1.99-3
I expect that noone has objections. However, if I'd only add these entries
to the list because `I think it's the right thing to do', I'd get a lot of
flames afterwards :)
Commentaires récents
il y a 21 semaines 5 jours
il y a 23 semaines 6 jours
il y a 26 semaines 5 jours
il y a 29 semaines 1 jour
il y a 32 semaines 5 jours
il y a 32 semaines 6 jours
il y a 33 semaines 6 jours
il y a 38 semaines 1 jour
il y a 45 semaines 20 heures
il y a 45 semaines 6 jours